Gaming

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT Assessment: Good Efficiency, if You Can Purchase One

[ad_1]

There’s nonetheless no finish in sight to the insane graphics card scarcity and ensuing value spikes which have turned our market the other way up. For over a 12 months now, it has been just about inconceivable to discover a graphics card in India promoting at wherever close to its MSRP – folks have been compelled to pay double and even triple what may be thought of cheap costs, and second-hand or low-end fashions are sometimes the one decisions left to these with out limitless budgets.

We had hoped to see issues enhance on the provision aspect with a bit of extra competitors because of AMD’s latest resurgence. Extra choices available in the market ought to imply higher probabilities for shoppers to search out one thing that works by way of value and efficiency. Nevertheless, whereas AMD’s official value in India is Rs. 31,990 (plus taxes), the state of affairs on the bottom continues to be dire with poor availability and outrageous markups.

We have already reviewed the Radeon RX 6800 and Radeon RX 6800XT, that are high-end fashions aimed toward lovers who wish to recreation at 4K. Now, a extra reasonably priced spinoff, the Radeon RX 6600 XT, has landed up, and is getting the complete evaluation remedy right this moment.

Primarily based on the identical RDNA2 structure as its larger siblings, AMD is focusing on avid gamers who wish to step as much as full-HD 1080p gaming at top quality settings, with a little bit of a push into 1440p and even 4K in much less resource-hungry video games. In a super market, this GPU needs to be a great improve choice for anybody with a mainstream graphics card that is three or extra years previous – however how a lot cash do you have to truly be keen to pay for it? Learn on to search out out.

radeon rx6600xt angle ndtv radeon

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers good 1080p efficiency in most video games

 

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU structure and specs

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is just not essentially the most highly effective GPU in its stack, but it surely does promise up-to-date options together with ray tracing, help for FidelityFX Tremendous Decision (FSR) upscaling, DirectX 12 Final, variable fee shading, and HDMI 2.1. These are issues that permit avid gamers get pleasure from visible high quality enhancements at snug body charges and refresh charges, at cheap resolutions. In spite of everything, lots of people have 1080p displays and are not even seeking to improve to bigger ones.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU has 2,048 ‘stream processors’ clustered into 32 compute items, every of which additionally has its personal ray accelerator logic. The reference ‘recreation clock’ which is the pace when not idling, is 2,359MHz, whereas the utmost increase clock is 2,589MHz. There’s 32MB of on-die Infinity Cache, which is claimed to be very quick, however there’s a lot much less of it right here than on the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT. You additionally get H.264 and H.265 encode/decode plus VP9 and AV1 decode {hardware} acceleration as much as sure resolutions and body charges. Like its siblings, this GPU is fabricated on a 7nm course of. All Radeon RX 6600 XT playing cards could have 8GB of GDDR6 reminiscence on a 128-bit bus for as much as 256GBps of reminiscence bandwidth. AMD suggests a 160W TDP, which could change primarily based on board companions’ customized designs.

AMD has made an fascinating selection – the Radeon RX 6600 XT makes use of solely eight PCIe lanes. It is PCIe 4.0 compliant, so that also provides you an identical bandwidth as 16 lanes of PCIe 3.0, however solely on a platform that helps the newer customary. On an older system, being restricted to eight lanes means you get solely half the theoretical peak PCIe 3.0 bandwidth, even in an x16 slot. Few GPUs absolutely saturate their PCIe hyperlinks however this may trigger some slight bottlenecks.

You may additionally want a comparatively trendy PC to make use of AMD’s Good Entry Reminiscence function. That is an implementation of the Resizable BAR (Base Handle Register) which permits a CPU to entry your GPU’s whole reminiscence capability fairly than the normal 256MB restrict, lowering latency. Some video games can see as much as 10 p.c higher efficiency.

radeon rx6600xt top ndtv radeon

The 8-pin PCIe energy connector is on the finish of the circuit board, however the cooler extends a lot farther

 

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT design and specs

There isn’t a reference design for this mid-range GPU tier, so all Radeon RX 6600 XT playing cards will ship with customized coolers designed by their producers. ASRock has taken the concept of customisation very severely, and we now have lots occurring right here by way of design. To begin with, this card is completely large. It is 305mm lengthy, which is about 40mm longer than common high-end playing cards, and it’ll grasp over the sting of a typical ATX motherboard. It is thick sufficient to dam three slots in your motherboard and can be taller than customary playing cards.

The three followers on the entrance all have notched blades which ought to assist with airflow and noise discount. Solely the one within the center has RGB LED lighting – its blades are clear with a frosted end, whereas the opposite two followers have translucent smoky gray blades. Whether or not its blades are spinning or idle, the central fan’s RGB LEDs are animated in a round sample which seems neat. There’s one other panel on the highest that additionally has RGB LEDs and an ASRock Phantom Gaming brand. You may sync the lights with those on a appropriate ASRock motherboard, and tweak them utilizing the downloadable software program management panel.

When you look intently, you may see that the precise PCB of the cardboard is just not greater than 190mm lengthy. The remainder of the area underneath the shroud is occupied totally by aluminium heatsink fins. This additionally makes the one 8-pin PCIe energy connector appear to be it is positioned in the midst of the cardboard, but it surely’s on the finish of the particular board the place it needs to be. The metallic backplate ought to give this whole contraption some rigidity which is sweet as a result of it weighs 894g.

ASRock calls this card “OC Version” on the field however speeds are solely very barely raised over inventory – the sport clock is 2428MHz whereas the increase clock is 2607MHz. You get three DisplayPort 1.4 and one HDMI 2.1 port on the rear. The cardboard comes with plastic mud stoppers for all ports, plus a sled for the PCIe connector, that are good touches, however there’s nothing else within the field. The corporate in fact claims to have used high-end parts. AMD’s inventory advice is for a 500W energy provide however ASRock has padded that to 550W.

radeon rx6600xt ports ndtv radeon

You get three DisplayPorts and one HDMI output, all with plastic mud caps

 

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT efficiency

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT was supplied for testing by AMD, since there aren’t any reference playing cards. Our customary check bench consists of an AMD Ryzen 2700 CPU, ASRock X470 Taichi Final motherboard, 2x8GB of G.Talent F4-3400C16D-16GSXW DDR4 RAM, a 1TB Samsung 860 Evo SSD, and a Corsair RM650 energy provide. The monitor was a 4K Asus PB287Q. As it is a PCIe 3.0 platform, among the advantages of all-new {hardware} as described above cannot be exploited. All the newest drivers and Home windows 10 patches have been utilized on the time of testing.

Artificial testing lets us evaluate completely different GPUs with similar workloads underneath similar situations. The desk under outlines how the brand new Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU fared in opposition to its prime competitors, the GeForce RTX 3060, in addition to just a few different reference factors in these industry-standard exams.

  ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT Asus Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Version Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Tremendous Founders Version AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
3DMark DLSS Function Take a look at (off / on) N/A 23.67fps / 58.94fps 32.06fps / 79.31fps N/A N/A
3DMark Port Royal 4,398 5,105 6,911 4,998 N/A
3DMark Time Spy 8,557 8,485 10,719 8,771 7,794
3DMark Time Spy Excessive 4,031 3,925 5,058 4,044 3,521
3DMark Fireplace Strike Excessive 11,695 9,851 13,334 10,049 10,221
3DMark Fireplace Strike Extremely 6,421 5,182 7,304 4,552 5,355
3DMark Ray Tracing Function Take a look at 11.16fps 19.8fps 27.2fps N/A N/A
Unigine Superposition (4K Optimised) 7,058 6,912 9,587 N/A N/A

Center Earth: Shadow of Warfare managed a mean of 40fps operating at its Extremely high quality preset at 4K, however there have been some dips with the bottom level touching 15fps and highs going as much as 152fps, as reported by the built-in benchmark software. Bringing the decision right down to 1440p allowed the common to rise to a really respectable 70fps.

Metro: Exodus comes with a separate benchmarking software. Working at 1080p with the Excessive preset, the common body fee was 38.49fps, which reveals that even at this decision, some video games can push too laborious for this GPU. Stepping right down to the Extremely preset raised the body fee common to 64.5fps, and at Regular high quality, that rose once more to 89.06fps. Transferring on to Troy: A Complete Warfare Saga’s Battle benchmark mode, the common body fee was 21.5fps at 4K and Extremely high quality. Selecting the extra real looking Top quality setting at 1080p resulted in a mean of fifty.02fps.

Far Cry 5 ran at 70fps on common at 1080p, 63fps at 1440p, and 49fps at 4K, utilizing the Extremely preset. Murderer’s Creed: Odyssey is a little more demanding, and ran at 34fps on common at 4K. It took a step down in decision to 1440p in addition to lowering the picture high quality to the Excessive preset to get a mean of 42fps.

Enjoying by means of one in all Doom Everlasting’s Grasp Ranges, this recreation confirmed simply how effectively it could run even on mid-range {hardware}. With the standard set to Extremely Nightmare and the decision at 4K, this recreation had no bother pushing out a stable 60+fps whereas operating round, and solely dipped to about 50fps in intense battles. There was a bit of delicate tearing however no main stutters. The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt additionally performed easily at round 95fps whereas strolling round, with the decision set to 1440p and each graphics and post-processing set to Excessive.

Mid-range {hardware} is a good use case for AMD’s new FidelityFX Tremendous Decision function which permits video games to be rendered at decrease resolutions after which use software program upscaling to look sharper with out placing pressure on a GPU. This function is gaining developer help, however there aren’t an enormous variety of video games on the market but which have applied it. Working at 1440p and utilizing the Extremely Excessive preset with out FSR enabled, Anno 1800’s in-game benchmark reported a mean body fee of 52.94fps. On the Extremely High quality FSR stage, that went as much as 71.03fps, and on the Efficiency stage, the outcome was a exceptional 100.83fps. Picture high quality did degrade visibly on the Efficiency stage, however as you possibly can see, you do not have to go to this excessive to have a really playable expertise.

Godfall can be one of many first FSR-enabled video games. Set to 1440p on the Epic high quality preset, the sport managed 35.2fps which isn’t as easy as most avid gamers would really like. The Extremely Efficiency FSR stage took that as much as 52.7fps which was fairly a bit higher. Efficiency mode introduced that as much as a really substantial 70.3fps, however with main loss in picture high quality. You may wish to mess around with recreation high quality in addition to FSR stage settings to discover a steadiness.

The ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT makes use of its monumental heatsink successfully, and so the three followers make barely any sound when gaming. They could spin

radeon rx6600xt lights ndtv radeon

The RGB LED results won’t be to everybody’s tastes however they’re controllable in software program

 

as much as their highest pace solely when actually burdened in benchmarks, besides there is no noise. When not wanted, the followers spin down and keep fully silent. There’s additionally no jet of sizzling air being pushed out the again.

 

Verdict

The Radeon RX 6600 XT GPU is mostly on par with or marginally quicker than the GeForce RTX 3060. It is available in at a barely larger official MSRP, and though that is already rather a lot for a GPU on the 1080p stage, it might need been comprehensible in regular instances. Nevertheless, the easy truth is that MSRPs imply completely nothing proper now. Whereas extraordinarily tough, it’s no less than potential to purchase Nvidia’s Founders’ Version playing cards immediately from the distributor in India at its official value, and AMD presents no such association. Within the open market, the ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT sells for barely over Rs. 60,000 which is plainly ludicrous. One different model, Sapphire, has a Radeon RX 6600 XT mannequin listed on-line at round Rs. 48,000, however most others are priced nearer to the ASRock card. On prime of that, they’re all out of inventory.

Though AMD has delivered good efficiency, there is no fast or simple option to get it into the palms of Indian avid gamers. It is a pity, as a result of this might have been a good time for avid gamers, with loads of high-profile titles on the horizon, and options like ray tracing and FSR that give folks higher experiences than they could have anticipated.

The Radeon RX 6600 XT is just not a nasty GPU, however the MSRP is already pushing the restrict of how a lot you must pay for one if you’ll find it. ASRock’s Phantom Gaming card, particularly, could be a great candidate, so long as you’ve gotten a roomy PC case and just like the seems of it, however the GPU is extra of a differentiating issue than the model promoting you a graphics card primarily based on it.

ASRock Phantom Gaming Radeon RX 6600 XT
Worth: Rs. 60,400 (MOP)

Professionals

  • Good efficiency at 1080p and better in some video games
  • Quiet followers, no noise 

Cons

  • Extraordinarily costly 
  • Outsized, heavy cooler

Rankings (out of 5)

  • Efficiency: 4
  • Worth for Cash: 2
  • Total: 3

Supply hyperlink

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button